My Spiritual Coach
Quick search
  • About Me
  • About My Sessions
  • Your Past Lives Revisited
  • Discover Your Soul Mates
  • My Soul Mate Books
  • Psychic Phenomena and Powers
  • Auras, Out-of-Body, and Life after Life Experiences
  • Astrology, Saturn, and Past Lives
  • Balance and Enhance Your Energy Centers (Chakras)
  • Blog - Q&A
  • Contact
  • Resources

In what ways do Kant's categorical imperative and utilitarianism differ? How is that difference significant when both frameworks are presented with moral and ethical decisions?

9/13/2018

0 Comments

 
The main difference is that Kant’s Categorical Imperative starts with the individual while Utilitarianism starts with the group.

Categorical imperative is Kant’s proposed way of evaluating our motivations for why we act. He talks about two kinds of imperatives (things that must be done). They are both based on the individual:
  • Hypothetical imperatives, that have a specific end in mind, such as: To stop being hungry, I must eat something.
  • Categorical imperatives, in which our actions are based on moral principals, and are an end in themselves because they come from our moral goodness. They are not to attain something but to emulate what you would want to consider as a universal law.

He says, “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end.” The way he puts it is complicated, but it is really a secular way of dealing with moral duty and ethical decisions.

The Church created moral duty using the motivation of our punishment with eternal damnation. The State imposes ethical duty with imprisonment and other punishments. Kant says that it’s not because of our fear of hell or punishment that the good person chooses his actions, it’s because he has figured it out that it is his duty to be good and do good things.
​

Possessing good will is one thing, but the reason we actually perform a good action is the result of our obligation to do the right thing. In other words, we ought to. So, it is a highly individual effort, focussing on the higher good of others as a result of our choosing the good action over the bad.

Utilitarianism starts with the group and then goes to the individual. It is about figuring out what is the greatest good for the greatest number and then basing our actions on that deduction.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    As a spiritual guide, healer, and lecturer, I have had the privilege to touch the lives of people who long to understand their higher selves. Please leave questions and comments for me. Hope to see you often here!

    Categories

    All
    Chakras
    Consciousness
    Death And Dying
    Dreams
    Energy Fields
    Enlightenment
    Good And Evil
    Health And Healing
    Karma
    Life After Life
    Meditation
    Movie Reviews
    Past Lives
    Philosophy
    Present Moment Awareness
    Purpose In Life
    Religions
    Soulmates
    Spirit Guides Angels
    Spiritual Growth
    State Of The World
    The Soul
    The Universe

    Archives

    May 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017

    RSS Feed


© Copyright June Marshall, 2014 - Present. 
    All rights reserved.       


Site designed and maintained by Newmedia Publishing